Tecnifibre TFight 305 ISO (2023)
Tecnifibre · similarity 100% · 46 % der DNA-Achsen liegen für beide Rahmen vor.
- balance +0.0 mm
- headSize +0.0 cm2
- length +0.0 mm
Tecnifibre TF40 305 (2022)
Tecnifibre · TF40 · 2022Technische Daten
30 % coverage| Spec | Value | Source | Claimed vs measured |
|---|---|---|---|
| Head size | 632,3cm² | brandTecnifibre published specification | claimed only |
| Length | 685,8mm | brandTecnifibre published specification | claimed only |
| Weight, unstrung | 305g | brandTecnifibre published specification | claimed only |
| Balance | 310 mm · 10.3 pts HL | brandTecnifibre published specification | claimed only |
| Mains | 16 | brandTecnifibre published specification | claimed only |
| Crosses | 19 | brandTecnifibre published specification | claimed only |
| Weight, strung | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (g). |
| Swingweight | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (kg_cm2). |
| Twistweight | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (kg_cm2). |
| Stiffness (RA) | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (ra). |
| Beam, throat | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (mm). |
| Beam, mid | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (mm). |
| Beam, tip | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (mm). |
| Grip size | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (mm). |
| Composition | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (text). |
| Power potential | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (ratio). |
| Sweet zone size | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (cm2). |
| Recoil weight | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (kg_cm2). |
| MgR/I | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (none). |
| Plow-through | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (ratio). |
We hold 6 of 20 spec keys for this frame (30 % coverage). Missing values are shown as missing — never as a zero and never as an average.
Rezensions-Konsens
Noch keine ausgewerteten Rezensionen zu diesem Rahmen.
Wir haben zu wenige extrahierte Aussagen, um etwas Belastbares zu sagen.
Von Spielerinnen und Spielern auf Racketics
Hier geschrieben von Leuten, die den Schläger spielen. Bei jedem steht, was die Person uns über ihr eigenes Spiel gesagt hat — ihre Angabe, keine Messung.
Zu diesem Schläger hat hier noch niemand etwas geschrieben.
Wenn du ihn spielst, wärst du die oder der Erste.
Schreib über diesen Schläger
Spielt sich ähnlich
Gewichteter Abstand über die Spec-DNA-Achsen. Keine Aussage darüber, welcher Rahmen besser ist.
Solinco Whiteout 305 (2022)
Solinco · similarity 100% · 34 % der DNA-Achsen liegen für beide Rahmen vor.
- headSize +0.0 cm2
- length +0.0 mm
- weightUnstrung +0.0 g
Diadem Elevate 98 Tour V3 (2023)
Diadem · similarity 100% · 34 % der DNA-Achsen liegen für beide Rahmen vor.
- headSize +0.0 cm2
- length +0.0 mm
- weightUnstrung +0.0 g
ProKennex Black Ace 98 (2022)
ProKennex · similarity 100% · 34 % der DNA-Achsen liegen für beide Rahmen vor.
- headSize +0.0 cm2
- length +0.0 mm
- weightUnstrung +0.0 g
Völkl C10 Pro (2020)
Völkl · similarity 100% · 18 % der DNA-Achsen liegen für beide Rahmen vor.
- headSize +0.0 cm2
- length +0.0 mm
Yonex Percept 97 (2023)
Yonex · similarity 97% · 46 % der DNA-Achsen liegen für beide Rahmen vor.
- weightUnstrung +5.0 g
- headSize −6.5 cm2
- balance +0.0 mm