Yonex Vcore 100 (2023)
Yonex · similarity 100% · 46% of the DNA axes are present on both frames.
- balance +0.0 mm
- headSize +0.0 cm2
- length +0.0 mm
| Spec | Value | Source | Claimed vs measured |
|---|---|---|---|
| Head size | 645.2cm² | brandBabolat published specification | claimed only |
| Length | 685.8mm | brandBabolat published specification | claimed only |
| Weight, unstrung | 300g | brandBabolat published specification | claimed only |
| Balance | 320 mm · 7.2 pts HL | brandBabolat published specification | claimed only |
| Stiffness (RA) | 67RA | retailerPublished retailer spec sheet (nominal) | claimed only |
| Beam, throat | 23.0mm | brandBabolat published specification | claimed only |
| Beam, mid | 26.0mm | brandBabolat published specification | claimed only |
| Beam, tip | 23.0mm | brandBabolat published specification | claimed only |
| Mains | 16 | brandBabolat published specification | claimed only |
| Crosses | 19 | brandBabolat published specification | claimed only |
| Weight, strung | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (g). |
| Swingweight | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (kg_cm2). |
| Twistweight | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (kg_cm2). |
| Grip size | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (mm). |
| Composition | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (text). |
| Power potential | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (ratio). |
| Sweet zone size | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (cm2). |
| Recoil weight | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (kg_cm2). |
| MgR/I | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (none). |
| Plow-through | not published | — | Nobody publishes this for this frame. We do not estimate it (ratio). |
We hold 10 of 20 spec keys for this frame (50% coverage). Missing values are shown as missing — never as a zero and never as an average.
Too few claims in that cohort (0 < 5), so the figures below are across all reviewers. We would rather say that than segment noise.
Fewer than 5 reviews in this segment, so this is the figure for everyone.
Fewer than 5 reviews in this segment, so this is the figure for everyone.
Fewer than 5 reviews in this segment, so this is the figure for everyone.
Fewer than 5 reviews in this segment, so this is the figure for everyone.
Fewer than 5 reviews in this segment, so this is the figure for everyone.
Fewer than 5 reviews in this segment, so this is the figure for everyone.
Fewer than 5 reviews in this segment, so this is the figure for everyone.
Fewer than 5 reviews in this segment, so this is the figure for everyone.
Fewer than 5 reviews in this segment, so this is the figure for everyone.
Engine consensus-1.0.0. Every figure carries its own n — a claim count, not a review count, because one review can make three claims and one forum thread is not twelve sites.
Written here by people who play the racket. Each one says what its author told us about their own game — their words, not a measurement.
Nobody has written about this racket here yet.
If you play it, you would be the first.
Weighted distance over the spec DNA axes. Not an opinion about which frame is better.
Yonex · similarity 100% · 46% of the DNA axes are present on both frames.
HEAD · similarity 100% · 46% of the DNA axes are present on both frames.
Yonex · similarity 100% · 46% of the DNA axes are present on both frames.
Dunlop · similarity 100% · 46% of the DNA axes are present on both frames.
Yonex · similarity 100% · 46% of the DNA axes are present on both frames.
Wilson · similarity 100% · 46% of the DNA axes are present on both frames.
Assistant
Say what feels wrong. It changes your profile, the engine recalculates, and it explains what moved.